Skip to content

Brookbanks Webinar: Comprehensive Coordination for Environmental Impact Assessments

The Brookbanks Difference / News / Brookbanks Webinar: Comprehensive Coordination for Environmental Impact Assessments
A picturesque sunset over the lush, green countryside of Deganwy, Wales, capturing nature's beauty.

In this webinar we explore how Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) can be better coordinated to support clearer, more robust planning decisions. Annabel Le Lohé and Katherine Peers set out how EIAs are intended to function, before focusing on the practical considerations that influence how effective an assessment is in practice, from early briefing decisions through to long‑term delivery. The session was aimed at those working across planning, development and technical disciplines who are involved in preparing, coordinating or contributing to EIAs, particularly on large and complex schemes.

What are Environmental Impact Assessments?

The webinar began with a refresher on what EIAs are required to assess and why the concept of “significance” is central to the process. Annabel explained how EIAs are designed to identify likely significant environmental effects, set out appropriate mitigation, and provide decision‑makers with the information needed to weigh environmental considerations alongside the planning balance.
The session also covered the distinction between Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 development, the screening and scoping process, and where Brookbanks most commonly supports projects through EIA coordination, particularly on large residential‑led schemes and complex sites.

 

Getting the Brief Right and Starting at the Right Time

A key focus of the session was the importance of setting a clear and realistic EIA brief at an early stage. Annabel and Katherine emphasised that EIA coordination often becomes problematic when project information is unclear, changing or poorly communicated across consultant teams.
They discussed why scoping should be informed by a clear understanding of the scheme, the planning context and potential sensitivities, and why defining a worst‑case scenario early can help reduce risk later. The importance of sharing planning context, site history and local policy expectations with the wider technical team was highlighted as a way to avoid surprises and rework further down the line.

Common Coordination Pitfalls

Drawing on experience from both their planning and technical perspectives, the Annabel and Katherine explored the common pitfalls that thy see arise during screening, scoping and assessment. These included inconsistent assumptions between disciplines, late engagement, contradictions in baseline data and difficulties caused by changing masterplans.
They also examined cumulative assessment, alternatives and interdependencies between topics such as transport, drainage, ecology, noise and air quality. Annabel and Katherine discussed how early communication between specialists, and agreement on assumptions and methodologies, can help avoid inconsistencies that weaken an Environmental Statement or lead to additional requests from decision‑makers.

 

Flexibility, Future‑proofing and Outcomes‑based Assessment

The second half of the webinar looked ahead to the transition towards outcomes‑based assessment and Environmental Outcome Reports, which are expected to replace the traditional Environmental Statement approach in the coming years. Annabel set out the government’s direction of travel, timelines and key phases, and discussed what this change is intended to achieve.
The conversation highlighted how future EIAs are likely to focus less on siloed technical chapters and more on holistic environmental outcomes that cut across disciplines. Katherine reflected on how this could help streamline reporting, reduce duplication and improve clarity, while also acknowledging the challenges that typically arise during regulatory transition periods.

A serene forest path covered in autumn leaves, surrounded by vibrant fall foliage.

Want to Learn More?

If you’re looking to learn more about Environmental Impact Assessments more generally or want to boost assessment coordination for your projects, watch the full webinar back now.

Plus don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up to date with industry updates and key insights.

Annabel Le Lohe, Associate Director at Brookbanks
Associate Director

Annabel Le Lohé

Read Profile
Katherine Peers, in front of a Brookbanks blue background
Project Consultant – Flood Risk and Drainage

Katherine Peers

Read Profile

More News

Back to News

The Risk of Stalling Healthcare Projects

May 12, 2026

The Risks Stalling Healthcare Projects There's a version of every healthcare project that looks deliverable on paper. The site sits within the right catchment. It's in the strategic outline case. The ICS has signed off on the clinical model, the architects have done something genuinely thoughtful with the brief, and the project team is cautiously optimistic about hitting the OBC submission window. Then the ground investigation comes back… or the highways authority raises a junction capacity objection that nobody reviewed thoroughly during site selection. Or the drainage strategy is finalised two weeks before the planning committee, and the mitigation required has discreetly added seven figures to a capital budget that is already full of assumptions. This might be “just how things are”, but it’s important to remember that healthcare projects carry specific consequences that a delayed commercial scheme may not have.

Read More

Mitigating the Impact of Global Uncertainty

April 30, 2026

Rising geopolitical tension does not affect development viability in isolation, but through increasing pressure on energy prices, supply chains and the cost of energy‑intensive materials. Where schemes are progressed on assumptions made under more stable conditions, these pressures can quickly challenge margins, appraisals and deliverability, particularly in a flat housing market. Our article looks at how developers can respond to build cost volatility in a more informed and proportionate way. Drawing on our specialists' experience, it explores how early coordination, design‑led value engineering and integrated decision‑making can help manage cost risk, protect scheme viability and avoid short‑term measures that compromise long‑term quality and value.

Read More